East Sepik Governor Allan Bird has initiated a Section 18 Supreme Court application to challenge the recent amendments to Section 145 (5) of Papua New Guinea’s Constitution. This legal motion questions the constitutionality of an amendment that mandates an 18-month grace period following a failed motion of no confidence, thereby delaying any subsequent attempts at such motions during that timeframe.
Bird expressed his reluctance to engage in court proceedings but felt compelled to act on this significant constitutional issue. “As the custodian and immediate successor to the chair of the founding father, I feel it is my duty to uphold and defend the Constitution,” he stated, emphasizing the importance of protecting the integrity of a document he respects and believes to be among the best globally.
He criticized the ongoing manipulation of the Constitution for political self-interest, arguing that it undermines the nation’s foundational values. Bird aims to seek the court’s interpretation and hopes for a ruling that will nullify the reportedly unconstitutional amendment, which he perceives as primarily serving the interests of a singular political figure.
This move aligns with broader concerns about governance in Papua New Guinea, particularly the role of no confidence motions in parliamentary accountability. PNG economist Paul Barker remarked that such provisions are critical for addressing governmental inefficiencies and corruption, particularly given the country’s lengthy five-year parliamentary terms compared to other nations like Australia. He cautioned that while the potential for disruption exists, maintaining a balance that excludes misuse of financial incentives can mitigate negative impacts.
Currently, the Parliament is set to deliberate on a motion of no confidence against Prime Minister James Marape, a pivotal moment in the political landscape, given the ongoing economic turmoil and governance challenges facing Papua New Guinea.
Amidst these tumultuous developments, an increased interest in reform and stability offers a glimmer of hope for improving governance and addressing the multifaceted crises that affect the nation. With various political factions engaging in dialogue, there is a potential for a constructive outcome that prioritizes political accountability and the welfare of the citizens.
Leave a comment