Fiji Labour Party leader Mahendra Chaudhry has voiced concerns that the Government is often dismissive of public sentiment regarding crucial national issues. During the Annual Delegate Conference held in Nadi, he criticized the current administration for its perceived lack of ethics and integrity, suggesting that it does not uphold the rule of law in light of recent events.
Chaudhry highlighted the appointment of Ratu Naiqama Lalabalavu as President, which occurred despite widespread public disapproval regarding fitness for the role. He argued that this reflects a broader tendency of the Government to disregard public opinion on significant matters.
Furthermore, he raised alarms about alleged unconstitutional appointments within the judiciary and law enforcement agencies, including the office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) and the Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC). He specifically pointed to the case of John Rabuku, whose appointment as Acting DPP was challenged and ultimately declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court, yet he remained in a position of influence for an extended period. This situation, along with others, was characterized by Chaudhry as an affront to authority and the rule of law—a notion that undermines public trust in legal institutions.
Chaudhry’s remarks spark pressing debates about governmental transparency and accountability. While these issues may seem daunting, they also create opportunities for civic engagement and potential reforms that could enhance public confidence in the government and its institutions.
The rising acknowledgment of ethical governance in Fiji may pave the way for greater responsiveness from the authorities. It highlights the importance of active citizen participation in governance, giving hope that collective voices can contribute to constructive change in national leadership and policy-making.
Leave a comment