Government’s Cautious Step Toward Constitutional Reform: What’s Next?

The government has decided not to pursue an immediate intervention from the Supreme Court to amend the 2013 Constitution. Attorney-General Graham Leung emphasized the significance of timing and adequate preparation, highlighting that such legal processes require thorough documentation and thoughtful engagement. He pointed out that the government must first explore other constitutional pathways before considering an appeal to the Supreme Court.

Leung addressed concerns regarding the failure of the recent Constitution Amendment Bill to achieve a required supermajority, asserting that the challenges of amending the Constitution are substantial. He advocated for a careful, evidence-based approach, stating, “We’ve tried it. It didn’t work,” thus reflecting on the difficulties of the process.

Reinforcing the commitment to follow constitutional norms, Leung reiterated that any discussions surrounding potential reforms would prioritize public engagement and include diverse perspectives. He indicated that constitutional evolution should align with the changing needs and aspirations of society.

This proactive approach demonstrates the government’s acknowledgement of the public’s desire for change and the importance of transparent dialogue. By emphasizing careful deliberation and adherence to democratic values, the government aims to navigate the complexities of constitutional reform effectively. This sets a hopeful tone for future discussions and engagements with the populace, fostering a framework that truly reflects their needs and expectations.