Shadow Minister for Justice, Ketan Lal, has called on the Prime Minister to take accountability for what he describes as the Coalition Government’s ongoing violations of the 2013 Constitution. Lal raised significant concerns regarding the recent decision made by Minister for Justice, Siromi Turaga, to place Dr. Nakarawa, the Commissioner of Corrections, on leave—a move he characterized as procedurally dubious and an inappropriate exertion of ministerial authority.
Lal emphasized that the position of Commissioner of Corrections is constitutionally independent, having been appointed by the President, and should not be influenced by a minister concerning employment issues. He pointed out that according to Section 137(4) of the Constitution, only the President, acting on the advice of the Constitutional Offices Commission, has the power to suspend the Commissioner and other officers appointed through this body.
The Shadow Minister criticized Minister Turaga for overstepping his bounds and suggested that if there were legitimate concerns regarding the Fiji Corrections Service, these should have been addressed through the proper channels, namely the Constitutional Offices Commission, rather than through direct ministerial action.
Lal further expressed his disappointment that the abrupt decision to sideline Dr. Nakarawa, without revealing any specifics regarding the allegations against him, erodes public trust in the Government and state institutions. He also voiced alarm over claims that Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka supports this course of action, underscoring that both the minister and the Prime Minister lack the legal power to mandate the Commissioner’s leave.
He warned that such actions not only constitute a misuse of power but could also set a precarious precedent for political interference within independent institutions. Lal noted that Dr. Nakarawa has not been informed about any allegations and has openly challenged the decision requiring him to take leave.
The Shadow Minister is concerned about a perceived pattern within the Coalition Government, wherein public officers appointed under the Constitution have been removed—a trend he sees as indicative of double standards and a potential disregard for good governance. He raised critical questions about whether this government is targeting independent constitutional officers who execute their duties with fairness and integrity.
Lal insists that Prime Minister Rabuka must not dismiss these serious allegations by claiming ignorance or shifting responsibility. He stressed that the citizens of Fiji are entitled to transparency and accountability regarding these actions.
In conclusion, Lal affirmed the Opposition’s commitment to ensure that the Rabuka administration is held accountable, emphasizing that the health of Fiji’s democracy relies on leaders who respect the rule of law and act within their designated authority.
This article highlights the critical need for accountability in governance and the importance of preserving the independence of constitutional offices. Such vigilance is essential to maintaining public trust in government institutions, which ultimately strengthens democracy. Observers might find solace in the Opposition’s proactive stance, as they work to uphold the principles of good governance and accountability within the government.
Leave a comment