Government's Cautious Step Toward Constitutional Reform: What’s Next?

Government Holds Off on Supreme Court Appeal: A Strategic Move for Constitutional Reform?

The government has chosen not to seek immediate intervention from the Supreme Court to amend the 2013 Constitution. Attorney-General Graham Leung stressed the importance of proper timing and thorough preparation in these legal matters, noting that any amendments require meticulous documentation and considerate engagement. He indicated that before contemplating an appeal to the Supreme Court, the government should first investigate other constitutional avenues.

Leung addressed the shortcomings of the recent Constitution Amendment Bill, which failed to secure the necessary supermajority for approval. He acknowledged the considerable challenges in amending the Constitution, stating, “We’ve tried it. It didn’t work,” which underscores the complexities involved in the process.

Reiterating a commitment to uphold constitutional norms, Leung mentioned that discussions on potential reforms would focus on public engagement and diverse input. He emphasized that constitutional changes should reflect the evolving needs and aspirations of society.

This approach highlights the government’s recognition of the public’s call for change and the necessity for open dialogue. By prioritizing careful consideration and maintaining democratic values, the administration seeks to navigate the intricate landscape of constitutional reform effectively. This strategy fosters a hopeful outlook for future discussions, aiming to create a framework that genuinely mirrors the needs and expectations of the populace.


Comments

Leave a comment

Latest News

Search the website