Fiji’s Vuda Point Waste-to-Energy Plan Faces Recycling Concerns

The Pacific Recycling Foundation (PRF) has issued a strong warning regarding the proposed waste-to-energy project at Vuda Point, expressing concern that it could jeopardize Fiji’s recycling initiatives. Founder Amitesh Deo emphasized that the project threatens not only livelihoods but also poses enduring environmental and health risks for the nation.

Deo pointed out that recycling should remain central to Fiji’s waste management strategy rather than being overshadowed by the operational needs of an energy facility. He highlighted that since the majority of waste in Fiji is still collected in mixed categories and recycling rates remain disappointingly low, there is a significant risk that recyclable materials could inadvertently end up in the energy plant unless stringent safeguards are established.

International evidence suggests that waste-to-energy plants can impede recycling development if they are not strictly limited to processing residual waste—this is particularly poignant for smaller island nations like Fiji. As such, the PRF is demanding clear information regarding the types of waste that the Vuda facility will handle, assurances for the protection of recyclables, and details on the sorting systems that will be put in place to avoid contamination before any energy recovery measures are implemented.

In addition to advocating for sustainable practices, the organization has raised alarms about potential air and water pollution, health hazards, and the need for substantial engagement with grassroots recyclers who rely on waste recovery for their income. PRF is calling for open and inclusive public discussions, reiterating that any waste-to-energy solution must reinforce recycling efforts, safeguard vulnerable populations, and prioritize the long-term health of Fiji’s environment and its citizens.

This cautious approach aims to foster a more sustainable and responsible framework for waste management in Fiji, ensuring that ecological integrity and community livelihoods are not sacrificed in the pursuit of energy solutions.