Fiji’s Transparency Tangle: What Lies Beneath the Confidential Inquiry Report?

Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka has opted not to publicly release the Commission of Inquiry (COI) report concerning the appointment of Barbara Malimali as the Commissioner of the Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC). This decision has ignited fresh inquiries about potential investigations involving senior government officials.

Counsel assisting the inquiry, Janet Mason, indicated that the report’s contents might advise against public release to avoid compromising any recommended actions. “It could well be that acting on the recommendation, releasing the report will prejudice the actions that need to be taken,” she explained, acknowledging the delicate nature of the report’s findings.

Despite increasing calls for transparency from critics and the public, Rabuka maintained that while the report might be significant, it could be necessary for the Fiji Police and FICAC in ongoing investigations. He stated, “I indicated to His Excellency that it might be premature to publicize the full report,” underscoring the potential risks associated with releasing sensitive information.

The inquiry thoroughly examined the appointment process conducted by the Judicial Service Commission (JSC) and investigated allegations of misconduct involving senior cabinet members. Rabuka has submitted follow-up actions to the President to ensure the COI’s recommendations are acted upon.

Deputy Prime Minister Manoa Kamikamica has expressed support for Ms. Malimali’s appointment, highlighting the JSC’s integrity, and reaffirming that the decision made was in the country’s best interest.

The atmosphere surrounding the inquiry reflects a broader commitment to improving governance in Fiji. The anticipation and discussions about the report indicate a collective desire for accountability and reforms, essential for restoring public trust in government. Although the non-release of the report raises concerns, it also signifies that necessary steps are being taken to address potential issues within the political framework constructively.

In summary, while immediate transparency is critical, the cautious approach taken by the government may ultimately lead to significant reforms and a more robust governance structure, reflecting hopes for a more transparent and accountable political environment in Fiji.