Fiji’s Quest for Truth: Will the Past Shape Its Future?

Spread the love

Fiji has been experiencing what the Leader of Opposition (LoP), Inia Seruiratu, describes as a “culture of convenience,” where the allure of easy solutions drives individuals or groups to take shortcuts for personal or political gain. His remarks come in response to the findings of the Government’s National Security and Defence Review (NSDR), which pointed to a significant lack of trust in the Fiji Police Force and the Republic of Fiji Military Forces (RFMF).

Mr. Seruiratu emphasized the importance of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) as an opportunity for the RFMF to shed light on the circumstances surrounding past coups. He stated that it is crucial to allow those involved in previous political turmoil to share their narratives, particularly referencing individuals linked to the events of 2000 and members of the military from the Queen Elizabeth and Sukanaivalu Barracks who faced imprisonment.

He called for an inclusive approach that also considers the events of 1987, asserting that only by confronting the truth can the country find liberation from its past. Drawing from his experience as a former RFMF officer, Mr. Seruiratu warned against overlooking uncomfortable truths, likening it to neglecting a spider while merely dusting its cobwebs.

In discussing the potential review of the 2013 Constitution, Mr. Seruiratu argued that such discussions should only take place after the TRC process is concluded “genuinely and honestly.” He pointed out that Fiji’s issues stem not from the Constitution itself, but from the egos of those who feel wronged by the democratic process and turn to coups for satisfaction.

Mr. Seruiratu noted that both the 1970 and 1997 Constitutions were altered following past coups, with new constitutions incorporating immunity provisions to shield coup instigators from legal repercussions. He urged for strong leadership and a sincere commitment from all sectors of society—including political leaders, traditional chiefs, religious figures, and the business community—to prioritize the interests of the people in these discussions.


Comments

Leave a comment

Latest News

Search the website