Fiji’s suspended chief prosecutor, Christopher Pryde, has publicly stated that the government secretly proposed a payment of NZ$150,000 for him to resign and avoid an inquiry surrounding allegations of “misbehavior.” The New Zealander, 59, has dismissed the offer, citing financial limitations that prevent him from defending himself in the inquiry.
Pryde expressed his belief that the government’s actions are part of an “ethno-national agenda,” alleging that foreigners and Indo-Fijians are being systematically replaced by iTaukei, the indigenous Fijians. He criticized the hiring practices in Fiji, suggesting that they prioritize ethnicity over merit, favoring iTaukei individuals in key positions.
The offer from the Judicial Services Committee (JSC) was made two months ago and was intended as a full and final settlement, stipulating that Pryde’s acceptance would bar him from pursuing any legal action against the JSC. Despite considering resignation, Pryde asserts that he has done nothing wrong and seeks a letter from the President that clears him of any misconduct to preserve his reputation.
Pryde was first appointed as director of public prosecutions in November 2011 but was suspended in April 2023, following a conversation with former Attorney General Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum at a public event. Questions arose regarding whether Pryde had access to a police file concerning an ongoing investigation into Sayed-Khaiyum. The allegations of misconduct stem from that interaction.
His benefits, including salary and superannuation, were terminated by the Fijian government amidst ongoing investigations, leading to concerns expressed by the Fiji Law Society about the fairness of the inquiry process. They refused to participate in the hearing, emphasizing the importance of procedural fairness under the Constitution.
The tribunal is expected to deliver its final recommendations to President Naiqama Lalabalavu by December 23. Pryde, anticipating the outcome, believes he will be dismissed and replaced by acting chief prosecutor Nancy Tikoisuva. Despite the current turmoil, there is hope that the final decision may bring clarity to the situation and allow for a more equitable process in Fiji’s judicial system.
This incident sheds light on significant issues surrounding governance, representation, and justice in Fiji, emphasizing the need for transparency and fairness in legal proceedings. The outcomes of the tribunal could pave the way for improved systems that respect the rights of all individuals, regardless of their ethnic background.
Leave a comment