“Fiji’s Political Tension: MPs Clash Over Constitutional Reform Transparency”

Opposition Member of Parliament, Sanjay Kirpal, recently announced his decision to abstain from voting on the Constitution Amendment Bill 2025, citing a lack of a “holistic and transparent process” in the amendment proceedings. His statement underscores his commitment to ensuring that parliamentary processes are conducted with integrity and accountability, allowing all representatives the opportunity to grasp the implications of any proposed constitutional changes before making a decision.

Kirpal had previously advocated for the suspension of Standing Orders to enable a thorough examination of the bill. He emphasized that any amendment to Fiji’s Constitution should involve a transparent and inclusive process, guaranteeing that the perspectives of all Fijians are considered. “The Constitution must guarantee equal rights for every citizen, regardless of ethnicity, race, or color, fostering a society where unity, peace, and harmony prevail,” Kirpal remarked.

This decision aligns with sentiments expressed by other opposition MPs, including Rinesh Sharma and Sachida Nand, who also criticized the government’s approach to the amendment process. Sharma has raised concerns that the procedures lack transparency and do not adequately reflect the opinions of the populace. He indicated that while he acknowledges the necessity for constitutional revisions, it is crucial for these changes to be undertaken with care and considerate of public opinion.

The political atmosphere in Fiji has been marked by tension within Parliament, where some MPs have expressed frustrations over derogatory remarks and disrespect for dissenting voices. Kirpal’s recent experiences highlight the growing divide among opposition members, as differences in opinion regarding the bill’s importance and the amendment process itself have fueled internal conflict.

Despite these challenges, there exists a promising outlook for Fiji’s political landscape, as discussions surrounding constitutional reform indicate an openness to diverse viewpoints. The ongoing engagement among lawmakers may pave the way for a more inclusive and respectful political environment. This dialogue represents a significant opportunity to strengthen democratic principles and ensure that the governance framework genuinely reflects the aspirations of the nation’s diverse population.