The Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC) has stated that former Prime Minister Voreqe Bainimarama acted within his legal rights as the leader of the FijiFirst party in light of a recent investigation. This announcement follows allegations from Supervisor of Elections Ana Mataiciwa that Bainimarama breached the Political Parties Act by continuing to lead the party after being convicted on May 9, 2024.
Mataiciwa’s claims were based on Section 5(3)(b) of the Political Parties Act, which disqualifies individuals convicted of certain offenses from holding office in a political party for five years following their conviction. However, FICAC concluded that there is no explicit law preventing a convicted individual from remaining in a leadership role within their party if they do not seek new positions, a premise supported by Bainimarama’s actions leading up to the investigation.
FICAC indicated that Bainimarama was still a registered voter and therefore retained his position until he was formally removed on June 14, 2024, around a month after his conviction. Their investigation confirmed that he had not applied for any new official role after his sentencing, effectively allowing him to continue his leadership role under the existing political laws.
Additionally, FICAC closed a related investigation into Opposition member Faiyaz Koya, who faced allegations of improperly influencing party votes at Bainimarama’s direction. FICAC clarified that internal party matters are beyond their jurisdiction, thus also concluding Koya’s case without taking action.
The FICAC has recommended changes to the Electoral (Registration of Voters) Act 2012 to ensure stricter compliance regarding the removal of individuals convicted of serious crimes from political office.
This development highlights the ongoing discourse around political accountability in Fiji. As the nation considers potential amendments to its electoral laws, it may pave the way for a more transparent and responsible political environment, inspiring public confidence in governance and accountability.
Leave a comment