Fiji’s Commissioner of Police, Rusiate Tudravu, has firmly stated that the Fiji Police Force will not serve as a tool for political ambitions or personal gain, reaffirming the integrity and independence of law enforcement in the country. This declaration comes in response to queries about the investigation of high-profile public officials by the Criminal Investigation Department (CID).
Tudravu emphasized that the police will act strictly based on evidence, ensuring fairness to victims involved in any investigations. He expressed hope that political figures will respect the autonomy of the Police Force and refrain from using it for personal agendas. “If our political leaders understand this, we will perform our duties in accordance with the Police Act 1965, Section 5,” he remarked, highlighting the importance of legal compliance.
The Commissioner also pointed out that under his leadership, anyone breaking the law will face the consequences, promising that evidence would lead to appropriate legal action. “Anyone found will be investigated, charged, and brought to court—fair and square,” he stated.
Meanwhile, the ongoing controversy regarding Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC) Commissioner Barbara Malimali continues to unfold. The Commission of Inquiry (COI) has reported the dismissal of FICAC Manager Kulianiasi Saumi for alleged breaches of the FICAC Code of Conduct. Malimali’s decision has raised concerns regarding potential intimidation of witnesses, prompting the COI to recommend her suspension to ensure the integrity of ongoing investigations.
However, the Judicial Services Commission (JSC) has clarified that it lacks the authority to suspend Malimali, as her appointment is governed by specific legislation without provisions for such actions. This situation illustrates the challenging dynamics surrounding governance and accountability in Fiji, particularly regarding corruption investigations.
In summary, Commissioner Tudravu’s commitment to keeping the police unbiased and focused on upholding the law reflects a significant step toward maintaining public trust in law enforcement. Meanwhile, the situation with FICAC raises important questions about whistleblower protection and the safeguarding of a transparent investigatory process, potentially paving the way for meaningful reforms. As these investigations advance, there is hope that they will lead not only to justice but also to strengthened institutional integrity in Fiji’s governance.
Leave a comment