Barbara Malimali has lodged a complaint with the office of President Ratu Naiqama Lalabalavu concerning remarks made about her by Justice David Ashton-Lewis, Commissioner of Inquiry, during an interview with Australian radio station Radio 4CRB. Her attorney, Tanya Waqanika, stated that the comments were defamatory and asserted that Justice Ashton-Lewis is not immune from legal repercussions stemming from his statements.
In the interview, Justice Ashton-Lewis, who leads the inquiry into Malimali’s controversial appointment as Commissioner of the Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC), expressed serious concerns about her qualifications and motives. He stated that his investigation revealed that nine individuals might have obstructed justice regarding her appointment. He described Malimali as someone “universally seen as corrupt” and suggested that her rapid promotion within the judicial system was linked to her willingness to protect high-ranking officials from scrutiny.
These claims have prompted Ms. Waqanika to assert that they reveal Justice Ashton-Lewis’ bias, arguing that his remarks could prejudice the fairness of the Commission of Inquiry’s proceedings. She noted that judicial officers should not publicly comment on legal matters, highlighting the potential for detrimental impacts on ongoing investigations.
The Commission of Inquiry, which is examining both the processes surrounding Malimali’s appointment and whether any politically motivated interference occurred, includes intense scrutiny of how public trust in the integrity of governmental institutions can be preserved. Ongoing testimonies from key witnesses, including former ministers and members of public institutions, are expected to contribute to decisive findings.
This situation brings to light a broader examination of governance practices in Fiji, emphasizing the need for accountability and transparency. As these inquiries unfold, there remains hope that they will lead to significant reforms within the political framework of Fiji, restoring public confidence in governance and ensuring that judicial appointments uphold the highest ethical standards.
Leave a comment