The Commission of Inquiry (COI) investigating the appointment of lawyer Barbara Malimali as Commissioner of the Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC) is seeking an extension to its hearings, citing the extensive amount of evidence still to be reviewed. With only seven out of the 35 summoned witnesses having testified so far, the COI is requesting more time to ensure a thorough investigation.

Justice David Ashton-Lewis, the presiding judge of the COI, stated that the inquiry, which is set to submit its final report by the end of January, may need until the end of February to conclude its work effectively. He emphasized the importance of collecting detailed responses from witnesses, as simple answers are not sufficient for the comprehensive questioning required.

The inquiry aims to assess whether the process surrounding Malimali’s appointment in September was conducted legally and free of potential interference from vested interests, especially relating to ongoing FICAC cases involving prominent public officials. Counsel Assistant Janet Mason highlighted the institutional integrity issues that the inquiry touches upon, underscoring that it is not just about individuals but the credibility of the entire system.

Progress has been slow, largely due to the depth and complexity of the questioning process, which has seen various state officials providing factual and unbiased evidence. Justice Ashton-Lewis noted the necessity of thorough examination, stating, “We still have 28 to go,” indicating a significant workload ahead for the commission.

The request for an extension, if granted, will allow the COI to delve deeper into the testimonies provided and ensure a more comprehensive analysis of the circumstances surrounding Malimali’s appointment. This emphasis on detailed investigative work reflects a broader commitment to enhancing transparency and accountability within Fiji’s public sector.

The ongoing inquiry represents a critical turning point for governance in Fiji, as it aims to foster a culture of integrity and reinforce the importance of due diligence in public office. This could ultimately lead to meaningful reforms and strengthen public trust in governmental institutions.