The Fiji Human Rights and Anti-Discrimination Commission (FHRADC) is facing challenges regarding its independence following the appointment of a new commissioner by the Constitutional Offices Commission (COC). This process has drawn criticism as it does not align with United Nations standards for national human rights institutions. According to the 2013 Constitution, Fiji’s current status as a B-rated country indicates it has not fully complied with the UN’s Paris Principles on Human Rights.
The commission’s director, Loukinikini Lewaravu, emphasized the ongoing efforts to collaborate with the Office of Attorney-General to amend the regulation to establish a more independent recruitment process for commissioners. This initiative aims to elevate Fiji’s accreditation to an A status, reflecting full compliance with international standards.
Historically, the FHRADC faced severe reputational damage following the 2006 coup due to perceptions that its commissioners were appointed based on favoritism rather than merit. The commission lost its A-accreditation, indicating a significant decline in credibility, which it only regained after reapplying in 2021 for B status.
Lewaravu detailed the critical adjustments needed to enhance compliance, particularly regarding the recruitment process. She noted that currently, the COC appoints commissioners, which undermines the perceived independence necessary for an effective human rights institution. The proposed amendment would involve an independent panel in the selection process, enhancing transparency and integrity in appointments.
This proactive approach aims not only to restore FHRADC’s credibility but also to reinforce its commitment to human rights advocacy within Fiji. By focusing on merit-based appointments and establishing clearer guidelines for recruitment, the commission hopes to mend its reputation and regain trust from both the public and international community.
There is optimism surrounding these developments; as the commission works towards regaining its former status, it signifies a essential step toward improving the human rights landscape in Fiji. This commitment to reform may help foster a stronger foundation for accountability and transparency in human rights protection efforts, which is crucial for the nation’s future.
Leave a comment