A prominent figure in Fijian governance has spoken out on the Commission of Inquiry (COI) regarding the appointment of Barbara Malimali as Commissioner of the Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC). Jioji Kotobalavu, a former senior civil servant who served under five prime ministers, discussed the implications of this inquiry in an interview, describing the events as a cautionary tale for public office holders.
Kotobalavu, who is currently a public law lecturer at the University of Fiji, provided insights into the dismissal of former Attorney-General Graham Leung and highlighted the concept of non-justiciability, which asserts that certain decisions by the executive branch cannot be challenged in courts. He emphasized the responsibility of public officials to act in the public interest, explaining that while Leung did not technically break the law, his handling of Malimali’s appointment was inconsistent with the standards of professional integrity expected from someone in his position.
This discourse arrives amidst ongoing scrutiny surrounding Leung’s role in the appointment process, amid allegations that he advised the Judicial Services Commission to proceed with Malimali’s appointment while FICAC investigations into her conduct were still pending. Kotobalavu critiqued this move, suggesting that greater caution and adherence to judicial processes could have preserved public trust and confidence in governmental institutions.
Additionally, Leung has publicly defended his actions, arguing that he was not responsible for Malimali’s appointment and decrying the COI’s findings as lacking fairness. He maintained that his involvement was merely consultative and within the legal framework outlined by the Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption Act of 2007. He has cautioned against the implications of the COI’s approach, stating that it could create a troubling precedent for political accountability in the future.
As Fiji navigates these complexities, Kotobalavu’s remarks resonate with a broader desire for ethical governance. The situation not only reflects existing challenges within the country’s political landscape but also highlights an opportunity for reform. Stakeholders are hopeful that these events may lead to improved standards of accountability and transparency in public office, thus fostering greater integrity in Fiji’s governance framework.
This ongoing discourse signifies a pivotal moment for the future of political practices in Fiji, with the potential for constructive change that aligns with the interests of the Fijian people in establishing trust in their governance structures.
Leave a comment