The investigation into Barbara Malimali’s appointment as the Commissioner of the Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC) has initiated an important discussion regarding governmental interference. Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka has firmly stated he will refrain from involvement in any discussions surrounding Malimali’s potential removal, emphasizing that this issue lies within the jurisdiction of the Judicial Services Commission.
Rabuka asserted the importance of adhering to proper protocols during the investigation, which evaluates whether the appointment process maintained integrity, fairness, and transparency standards. He expressed a commitment to identifying potential abuses of authority, insisting that any findings should remain independent and free from outside influence.
The Commission of Inquiry that is probing Malimali’s appointment is tasked with scrutinizing the legality and ethical standards followed during her selection. Critically, this inquiry seeks to understand if any irregularities occurred amidst the circumstances that overshadow her appointment, notably as she was under investigation by FICAC in her previous role as chairperson of the Electoral Commission.
Previous reports have highlighted significant concerns regarding the timing of Malimali’s appointment, particularly as it coincided with impending corruption charges against Deputy Prime Minister Biman Prasad. Former Acting Deputy Commissioner of FICAC, Francis Pulewai, indicated that a notification pertaining to these charges was dispatched to Rabuka and Justice Minister Siromi Turaga just prior to Malimali’s appointment. Since she assumed her role at FICAC, these charges against Prasad have been suspended.
Additionally, in response to the growing scrutiny regarding public officials’ conduct, Rabuka expressed support for a proposed new Code of Conduct for public officeholders, initiated by President Ratu Naiqama Lalabalavu. This aim is to strengthen ethical guidelines and ensure accountability within the public sector.
In the current climate, a petition advocating for Malimali’s removal is gaining traction amid escalating concerns surrounding her appointment. The inquiry into her selection process is viewed as a potential turning point for maintaining public trust in Fiji’s governance structures, which could ultimately lead to a stronger emphasis on transparency and integrity in public office.
This situation represents a crucial moment for Fiji, where the commitment to ethical governance may pave the way for positive reforms within its political landscape.
Leave a comment