The Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC) has addressed public outcries for its dissolution, emphasizing that any such action must comply with legal regulations and cannot be initiated unilaterally by the Commission. Acting Commissioner Lavi Rokoika articulated that while the public is entitled to express their opinions, FICAC exists as a statutory body established under the law of Fiji.
Rokoika highlighted that any decision to dismantle or dissolve FICAC must originate from Parliament rather than the Commission itself. “People are entitled to their views. But the organization itself is an entity created by law, and to dismantle or dissolve it requires a lawful process that needs to be followed,” she stated.
In light of ongoing court cases involving individuals such as Manoa Kamikamica and Biman Prasad, Rokoika refrained from commenting on potential investigations concerning Cabinet Ministers, reiterating that she cannot disclose information regarding cases outside those current before FICAC.
Furthermore, Rokoika dismissed allegations that the Commission targets individuals based on their political affiliations, affirming that the investigation protocols apply equitably to all individuals. She reiterated that the handling of complaints is unaffected by a person’s societal status, whether they are an unemployed citizen or a politician.
When asked about the existence of complaints involving other Ministers under FICAC’s scrutiny, Rokoika acknowledged that there may be complaints but did not divulge specific details. This open response reflects the Commission’s commitment to uphold transparency while adhering to legal boundaries.
By reinforcing its statutory role and emphasizing adherence to due process, FICAC aims to maintain public trust and promote integrity within the governance framework of Fiji.
Leave a comment