Fiji is experiencing what the Leader of Opposition (LoP) Inia Seruiratu describes as a “culture of convenience.” This phenomenon refers to the tendency of individuals or groups to take shortcuts for their personal or political benefit. Seruiratu’s comments come in response to the findings of the Government’s National Security and Defence Review (NSDR), which indicated a significant lack of trust in the Fiji Police Force and the Republic of Fiji Military Forces (RFMF).
Regarding the past coups in Fiji, Mr. Seruiratu stated that the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) offers a critical opportunity for the RFMF to disclose the circumstances surrounding these incidents. He emphasized the importance of allowing those involved in the political turmoil of the past to share their narratives, which encompasses the recently released individuals connected to the events of 2000, as well as members of the military who faced incarceration during that period.
He stressed that the stories from the events of 1987 should also be acknowledged, asserting that only by confronting the truth can the nation find freedom. Drawing from his experience as a former RFMF officer, he remarked that failing to expose the truth would be akin to merely covering up an ongoing issue.
On the topic of constitutional reform, Mr. Seruiratu insisted that any discussions about revising the 2013 Constitution should only take place after the TRC’s work has been completed authentically. He pointed out that Fiji’s challenges stem not from the Constitution itself but from individuals or groups feeling disenfranchised by the democratic process, leading them to enact coups to fulfill their political ambitions.
He referenced the changes made to the Constitution following the upheavals in 1987, 2000, and 2006, noting that new constitutions often contained provisions protecting those responsible for these disruptive events. Mr. Seruiratu concluded by calling for genuine leadership and commitment from various sectors of society, including political and community leaders, chiefs, religious figures, and the business community, emphasizing that the interests of the people must be prioritized in these discussions.
Leave a comment