The Commission of Inquiry (COI) investigating the appointment of Barbara Malimali as the Commissioner of the Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC) is seeking to extend its hearings until the end of February. This extension is necessitated by the significant volume of evidence yet to be reviewed, as only seven out of the 35 summoned witnesses have testified so far.

Justice David Ashton-Lewis, presiding over the COI, expressed the need for a comprehensive examination of testimonies, noting that simple “yes” or “no” answers are insufficient for the depth of understanding required. He indicated that while the COI is expected to submit its final report by January 31, it may need additional time to ensure that all relevant voices are heard and to maintain the integrity of the inquiry.

The inquiry’s objective is to assess whether the appointment process that led to Malimali’s selection last September adhered to legal protocols and was free from undue influence. This includes examining potential vested interests related to ongoing FICAC investigations involving prominent figures such as politicians and senior public servants. Counsel Assistant Janet Mason emphasized that the inquiry seeks to uphold not just individual accountability but also the overall integrity of the institutions involved, including the Judicial Services Commission (JSC) and the Constitutional Offices Commission (COC).

Despite the slow progress, witnesses have so far provided factual and unbiased accounts of their involvement, which has contributed positively to the inquiry’s goals. Justice Ashton-Lewis noted the importance of thorough questioning, stating, “We still have 28 to go,” hinting at the substantial amount of work ahead for the commission.

If the extension is granted, it would allow for a more detailed analysis of all testimonies, reflecting a commitment to transparency and thoroughness within Fiji’s governance. This inquiry represents a crucial moment for promoting integrity in public office and may pave the way for reforms that enhance accountability, thereby rebuilding public trust in governmental institutions.

In summary, the ongoing efforts of the COI signal a dedicated approach to uncovering the truth about the appointment of Malimali, with the potential for meaningful reforms that could ultimately foster improved governance and accountability in Fiji’s institutions. The extension request symbolizes hope for thorough investigation and commitment to integrity within the public sector.