The Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC) is currently under scrutiny as its Commissioner, Barbara Malimali, faces serious allegations during an ongoing Commission of Inquiry (COI). Commissioner Barbara Malimali has been vetting evidence prior to its presentation to the inquiry, which has raised concerns among counsel assisting, Janet Mason. Mason indicated that FICAC witnesses have informed the inquiry about the evidence vetting process, which she argues could impede the integrity of testimonies.
Mason emphasized the need for assurances that witnesses, including FICAC investigator Kuliniasi Saumi, will have unrestricted access to relevant documents and will not face any interference. She expressed concern about any potential alteration of evidence submitted to the COI, highlighting the commission’s broad powers to request documents without vetting by FICAC.
The COI, now in its eighth week, has gathered significant attention as it investigates Malimali’s conduct and her prior actions, including the controversial dismissal of key witness Kuliniasi Saumi. Mason has sought legal opinions on the possibility of referring the matter to the Judicial Services Commission (JSC) or advising suspension of Malimali by the Prime Minister under the Constitution, indicating that the process to achieve oversight within FICAC remains complicated.
It is noteworthy that Malimali declined to directly comment on allegations regarding her conduct, opting instead to maintain that the inquiry should run its course. Given these circumstances, the COI is set to recall several key FICAC witnesses, including FICAC legal manager Laite Bokini-Ratu and others, with testimony expected from the Chief Registrar and Chief Justice in the coming sessions.
The developments surrounding this inquiry underscore the essential need for transparency and accountability within Fiji’s governance framework. The ongoing dialogues and hearings stand as a hopeful prospect for reinforcing ethical standards and nurturing public trust in the capability of institutions designed to combat corruption. As the inquiry continues, there are optimistic expectations that necessary reforms will emerge, promoting a more transparent governance structure in Fiji.
Leave a comment