The Commission of Inquiry (COI) into the appointment of Barbara Malimali as Commissioner of the Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC) has recently addressed concerns regarding the payment delays experienced by its members. Senior Barrister Janet Mason clarified that the delays were not due to external factors; instead, they stemmed from the late submission of invoices. She explained that the invoices were submitted two weeks late because the team had been fully occupied with their work.
This statement comes as the inquiry progresses into its second week, focusing on the legal legitimacy of Malimali’s appointment made in September 2024 and any potential external pressures related to ongoing FICAC cases. Tanya Waqanika, Malimali’s legal counsel, has emphasized the thorough nature of the inquiry, suggesting that its complexity may necessitate an extension beyond the current timeline.
Interestingly, while Waqanika refrained from labeling the inquiry as a targeted effort to discredit her client, she did express that Malimali remains optimistic and supportive amidst the proceedings. The inquiry is being chaired by Supreme Court Justice David Aston-Lewis, who is committed to ensuring a comprehensive examination by utilizing detailed witness testimonies.
The inquiry aims not only to clarify Malimali’s appointment but also represents a broader commitment to enhancing transparency and accountability in Fiji’s governance systems. As the commission continues its work, there is hope that the findings will contribute to implementing vital reforms, ultimately restoring public confidence in governmental institutions.
This situation highlights the importance of maintaining integrity within public service appointments and marks a critical step towards a more transparent and accountable future in Fiji’s governance.
Leave a comment