Barbara Malimali, the recently dismissed Commissioner of the Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC), is currently in discussions with the State’s legal representatives over potential settlement options. This development follows her termination based on the Commission of Inquiry report into her appointment, which was delivered to both the Prime Minister and the President.
Malimali’s legal counsel, Tanya Waqanika, asserted in court that her dismissal was unconstitutional, contending that only the Judicial Services Commission possesses the authority to advise the President regarding such matters. She described the termination as a significant blow to Malimali’s 27-year career, claiming it has caused extensive damage to her reputation and has led to ongoing public defamation on social media.
In light of these discussions, Waqanika indicated that they are looking for substantial compensation and a public apology from the government. The state is being represented by Deputy Solicitor General Eliesa Tuiloma during these negotiations.
The implications of this case are notable. As Malimali prepares to confront the legal challenges associated with her dismissal, it could spark discussions about the boundaries of presidential power and the autonomy of FICAC, potentially leading to institutional reforms within Fiji’s governance structure. Calls for accountability and due process are being amplified, with hopes that this situation may ultimately contribute to restoring public confidence in Fiji’s anti-corruption efforts and governance integrity.
The ongoing situation underscores the importance of transparency and ethical conduct in public office and highlights the need for robust legal frameworks to ensure the principles of justice are maintained within governmental operations.
Leave a comment