The Leader of the Opposition in Fiji, Inia Seruiratu, has asserted that constitutions should not be treated as ordinary laws that can be easily amended by whichever government is in power. He emphasized that constitutions serve as social contracts that require the people’s trust and consent. During the debate surrounding the Constitution Amendment Bill 2025, Seruiratu expressed his readiness for constructive discussions with the government; however, he clarified that this willingness does not equate to uncritical support for the government’s agenda.
This moment is described by Seruiratu as pivotal for Fiji, highlighting the critical nature of the amendment bill and the need for ongoing collaborative dialogue reflecting a genuine spirit of bipartisanship. He remarked on the dissatisfaction expressed by the populace regarding the 2013 Constitution, particularly concerning the lack of consultation during its establishment — a concern he attributes to the aftermath of events like the 2006 coup.
He recalled that following the 2006 events, a National Council for Building a Better Fiji was convened, where he believes that the people’s views were adequately represented, even though some political factions were absent due to the political fallout. Seruiratu urged that amendments should involve public participation through referendums, asserting that such a process offers broader engagement than the usual parliamentary committee submissions, which often see low turnout.
He questioned which specific provisions the government aims to amend, pointing out that some groups currently derive benefit and security from the existing Constitution. As the bill awaits voting, these discussions underline an ongoing desire for an inclusive approach to governance.
In light of similar sentiments shared by other politicians, including the government members advocating for a Constitution created collaboratively with the citizens, there is hope that these discussions could lead to meaningful reforms. There’s a growing recognition amongst various factions in Fiji’s political sphere that engaging the populace could renew trust and strengthen democratic processes.
In conclusion, while tensions remain concerning the proposed amendments, there is an overarching desire for unity and collective decision-making, which could foster a promising and inclusive political environment in Fiji moving forward.
Leave a comment