Fiji has been experiencing a troubling trend described as a “culture of convenience.” Inia Seruiratu, the Leader of the Opposition, pointed out that this phenomenon encourages individuals and groups to take shortcuts for personal or political gain. His remarks came in response to findings from the Government’s National Security and Defence Review (NSDR), which revealed a lack of trust in both the Fiji Police Force and the Republic of Fiji Military Forces (RFMF).
Mr. Seruiratu highlighted the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) as a crucial opportunity for the RFMF to disclose the circumstances surrounding the previous coups. He emphasized that those involved in past political disruptions must be permitted to share their narratives, including recently released individuals associated with the 2000 coup, as well as military personnel from the Queen Elizabeth and Sukanaivalu Barracks who faced incarceration during that time. He also insisted that the accounts of those involved in the coups of 1987 be taken into account, stating that only by uncovering the truth can the nation find liberation.
The former RFMF officer asserted that without revealing the truth, the situation would merely be a superficial effort while deeper problems persist.
Regarding the review of the 2013 Constitution, Mr. Seruiratu insisted that discussions should only occur after the TRC process is genuinely and honestly completed. He argued that Fiji’s issues do not stem from the Constitution itself but from individuals or groups feeling disenfranchised by the democratic system, leading them to instigate coups for their political and personal ambitions.
He noted that following the 1987 coup, the 1970 Constitution had to be altered, and similarly, the 1997 Constitution was replaced in the aftermath of the events of 2000 and 2006. In each instance, the new constitutions included immunity clauses to safeguard the instigators of these coups from legal repercussions.
Mr. Seruiratu called for leadership and true commitment from all community sectors—political figures, community leaders, chiefs, religious organizations, the business sector, and the general populace—emphasizing that the interests of the people should remain at the forefront of all ongoing discussions.
Leave a comment