The Leader of the Opposition, Inia Seruiratu, has advocated for a national dialogue to fully address the events surrounding the upheavals of 1987, 2000, and 2006 prior to any amendments to the 2013 Constitution. In an interview, Seruiratu emphasized the importance of understanding the context and key figures involved in these historical events that have hindered Fiji’s development.
He stated, “We need to know what happened and who was behind all of these events that shook Fiji, and pushed us backward on the development path.” He argued that such discussions are critical for transparency and reconciliation, which are necessary to eliminate the root causes of past issues.
According to Seruiratu, the Constitution serves as the nation’s fundamental law, defining governmental powers and citizens’ rights. He described it as an essential framework for governance, highlighting that constitutions should be viewed as “living documents” open to revisions as national circumstances evolve.
He pointed out the need for a revised constitution that upholds the principle of popular sovereignty, allowing citizens to have a greater voice in governance. Reflecting on Fiji’s history, he noted that there have been four constitutions since independence in 1970—1970, 1990, 1997, and the 2013 version. Despite the claims of these documents being balanced or nearly perfect, Fiji experienced significant political upheaval in the years following their implementation.
Seruiratu stressed that constitutions by themselves do not resolve issues; rather, a commitment to inclusivity and shared aspirations is necessary for effectiveness. He called on the government to demonstrate leadership and ensure that any constitutional review is widely acceptable and sustainable.
He underscored the necessity for a thorough review process, beginning with political dialogues that involve leaders from various sectors. This conversation should focus on genuine discussions, active listening, problem identification, and constructive engagement to uncover the complex issues that have led to persistent conflicts.
“This process calls for political leadership… if we do not get to those root causes and collectively seek solutions, the proposed review of our constitution will merely be an exercise in futility,” Seruiratu concluded.