Assistant Director of Public Prosecutions Laisani Tabuakuro has stated that the recent delays in providing additional disclosures in the trial of three prominent members of the FijiFirst government were the result of an honest oversight. The trial, involving former Prime Minister Voreqe Bainimarama, former Attorney-General Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum, and former Health Minister Neil Sharma, is centered around charges of abuse of office, obstruction of justice, and breach of trust linked to alleged procurement irregularities from 2011.
Defense attorney Wylie Clarke has sought $20,000 in costs from the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) due to these delays. The case has garnered considerable attention and was called before Justice Usaia Ratuvili. Prosecutors allege that all three defendants failed to comply with statutory requirements under the 2010 Procurement Regulations.
Throughout the proceedings, both Ms. Tabuakuro and Mr. Clarke discussed the implications of these delays. Tabuakuro noted that the undisclosed documents were beyond the prosecution’s control, while Clarke argued that the situation had placed the court in an “embarrassing position,” especially given that the Office of the DPP had sought an expedited trial from the beginning.
Gul Fatima, representing Bainimarama and Sayed-Khaiyum, did not seek costs but emphasized the need for adequate time and scheduling consideration for a new trial, particularly if it were to be set for 2026.
Justice Ratuvili has scheduled a ruling on the matter for November 28, which is expected to address the requests from both the defense and prosecution regarding the delayed disclosures and the future of the trial proceedings. The trial originally scheduled for November 10 has now been postponed, reflecting the challenges faced by the legal system in addressing significant cases of this nature.
This case not only highlights issues of governance and accountability within Fiji’s public service but also emphasizes the necessity for transparency in governmental operations. As it unfolds, many citizens and legal experts are hopeful that the eventual outcomes will bolster trust in public institutions and standards within the government. The ongoing scrutiny aims to reinforce ethical conduct among public officials, ensuring adherence to established procedural regulations.
Leave a comment