Two intertwined threads from Fiji’s public life in the 1980s show a society wrestling with democratic processes at work in its unions and a revival of traditional leadership that underscored cultural identity.
In Suva in 1986, a dispute within the Fiji Public Service Association (FPSA) erupted as a group of civil servants known as the FPSA Concerned Group walked out of the annual meeting, labeling the gathering illegal. The event began with the association’s general secretary, Mahendra Chaudry, calling the meeting to order while DP Singh, the acting president, spoke. The room had been filled with 1,443 ballots cast to establish a quorum, but a member of the Concerned Group, Dr Josaia Taka, challenged the legality of the meeting, arguing that there was no true quorum given the hall’s capacity of 746 and the sheer number of attendees.
Amid heated exchanges, Singh warned he might call the police if disruptions continued. The group had tabled several motions, including one aimed at depriving civil servants of the right to associate with any political organization. Singh contended that such a motion would be unconstitutional and unenforceable because of its illegality, while he defended trade unionism as a long-standing defender of democracy and the vulnerable, noting current wage restrictions imposed by ministerial orders as evidence of a weakened bargaining position for workers.
Outside the meeting, about 300 people gathered as part of the FPSA Concerned Group’s protest. One organizer, Dr Filimone Wainiqolo, argued that the FPSA meeting was unconstitutional, pointing to the FPSA’s reported membership—about 7,304 members—and a constitutional quorum requiring 20 percent of that membership to be physically present. Wainiqolo said the group would persist in efforts to keep politics out of the FPSA and announced plans to file an injunction in the Supreme Court to stop FPSA executives from using association funds and to declare the day’s meeting illegal.
In another thread mixing governance with culture, Rotuma’s traditional leadership also drew attention in the mid-1980s. The title Gagaj Sau Lagfatmaro was revived early in the decade to restore Rotuman culture and traditions. An article published by The Fiji Times on January 16, 1985, described the revival led by Professor Henry Gibson. While some questioned the recognition of the title, Gibson claimed to hold a document from the Rotuma Council of Chiefs acknowledging it. The title was reportedly bestowed on Gibson in December 1982, and he described it as the King of the Molmahau clan, which encompasses seven districts in Rotuma. A Rotuman clan member, Pene Tigarea, contested the claim, suggesting the title had ties to non-Rotuman lines, while Ieli Irava of Malhaha wrote to support Solomone’s claim to the title of Gagaj Maraf. Gibson maintained that reviving the title was an effort to reawaken genuine culture, tradition, and identity, and he warned that political maneuvering in the election of chiefs risked eroding cultural foundations. He added that he would take action if disputes over the title continued.
Taken together, these episodes reflect Fiji’s complex interface between political life and cultural heritage. The 1986 FPSA dispute highlights tensions over constitutional norms, union rights, and the use of association funds, illustrating the fragile line between political advocacy and organizational governance. The Rotuma revival demonstrates a parallel insistence on authentic cultural identity and leadership structures, even as debates about legitimacy and recognition play out in traditional forums.
A hopeful takeaway is that both developments underscore a robust civil society capable of contesting rules and safeguarding heritage. The union episode points to a need for clear, transparent governance within public service bodies and a reaffirmation of constitutional rights. The Rotuma revival signals resilience in preserving language, customs, and leadership roles that bind communities together, reminding Fiji of the enduring value of its diverse cultures in the nation’s broader story.
Summary: Fiji’s 1980s landscape included a contentious civil-service meeting in Suva marked by questions of quorum and political involvement, alongside a cultural revival on Rotuma that revived an important traditional title and spurred ongoing discussions about authenticity and leadership. Together, they depict a society at the intersection of democratic process and cultural continuity, seeking a balance between modern governance and enduring heritage.
Leave a comment