Acting Deputy Commissioner of the Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC), Lavi Rokoika, is advocating for a thorough review of Fiji’s asset restraint and forfeiture processes, citing that the current procedures are inadequate and slow. This inefficiency allows individuals under investigation to hide or move assets before any legal actions can be finalized. During a recent address to the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and Defence, Rokoika highlighted concerns about how the law restricts these actions solely to the Attorney-General’s Office, leading to delays in effecting asset forfeiture.
She pointed out that the existing framework demands multiple approvals before assets can be sold or forfeited. “The multiple layers of approval are problematic,” Rokoika stated, emphasizing that the Commission has to write to the Attorney-General, who must then respond with approvals before any court-ordered sales can commence. This lengthy process can allow suspects the opportunity to evade justice, as Rokoika observed, “By the time everything is ready, the suspect is gone with all the money.”
Rokoika urged the Parliament to simplify and streamline these laws. She noted that other jurisdictions manage their asset forfeiture processes more efficiently, suggesting a reform could enhance FICAC’s operational effectiveness. She expressed optimism that a more responsive legal framework would enable the Commission to perform its duties more effectively, thereby improving Fiji’s accountability mechanisms in tackling corruption.
This call for reform aligns with the broader initiative within FICAC to revamp its operations amid ongoing challenges, including a significant backlog of corruption cases that have resulted from limitations in the court system. The recent extension of resources and establishment of new strategic reforms within FICAC indicate a commitment to strengthen oversight and improve public trust in the institution.
In a related focus, Rokoika has previously emphasized the need for a specialized anti-corruption court. The removal of such a court under the 2023 High Court (Amendment) Bill has further contributed to delays in corruption case resolutions. She reiterated the importance of such a court to facilitate timely justice and enhance efficiency in processing corruption cases.
FICAC’s ongoing reform efforts are seen as hopeful indicators of progress toward instilling greater integrity and accountability in Fiji’s governance. By ensuring swift and fair legal processes, Fiji can make strides in its fight against corruption, reinforcing public confidence in its judicial and governance systems.
Leave a comment