Submissions regarding the proposed Referendum Bill in Fiji have raised concerns over the adoption of what is viewed as regressive and outdated referendum models. Advocates are urging the country to instead look towards international best democratic practices.
Nilesh Lal, the executive director of Dialogue Fiji, emphasized in his submission that Fiji has long aspired to a more liberal and inclusive democratic system, a topic that has been a focal point of national discussions for over a decade. He acknowledged the importance of striving for democratic ideals but cautioned against emulating provisions from some of the poorest referendum legislation globally.
One particular area of concern highlighted by Lal is the reference to Singapore’s 1962 referendum, which is largely recognized as a flawed example of referendum conduct. “Sixty years later, we should not be copying anything from laws that led to such a referendum,” Lal stated, criticizing the framework being proposed.
Instead, Lal urged Fiji to learn from better comparative models, specifically mentioning Vanuatu’s upcoming 2024 referendum. This process has received international praise for allowing unrestricted civic education and campaigning, setting a standard that Fiji should aim to meet or surpass.
“If our Melanesian brothers are capable of conducting internationally respected referendums, I’m sure we can do way better,” Lal expressed, reinforcing the notion that Fiji possesses the potential to implement a successful and progressive referendum process that aligns with modern democratic values. This call to action not only highlights the need for improvement within Fiji’s political framework but also showcases the country’s capacity to adapt and thrive within a global context.
Leave a comment