Fiji’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission chair Rachna Nath has reaffirmed that coup survivors who come forward to share their experiences will be heard, supported, and shielded from punishment. Speaking at a community awareness session held at the Fiji National University Nasinu campus earlier this month, Nath described the restorative justice process as a safe space permitted under section 16 of the Truth and Reconciliation Act.
“No evidence shared during the process can be used against you in any civil or criminal proceedings,” Nath said. “Whatever you say, whether in writing or in person, cannot incriminate you. The only exception is intentionally providing false information.”
Nath stressed that the commission would recognise everyone affected as coup survivors, including those who may have caused harm. “This process is about acknowledging our shared vulnerabilities, not labelling perpetrators. We all carry wounds from the past,” she noted. Participation would be entirely voluntary, with no one forced to share their story. “Healing is a journey, and you will come forward when you are ready — whether that’s now, years from now, or not at all.”
Context and added perspective
Across the broader bàn of Fiji’s Truth and Reconciliation work, observers and advocates have emphasized that the commission is not a judicial body and will not issue verdicts. Its aim is to foster healing through open dialogue and truth-telling, with a strong focus on psychosocial wellbeing and the safety of survivors. Confidentiality is a cornerstone of the process, and data security measures are in place to ensure that discussions remain protected and accessible only to authorized personnel.
Experts have framed the TRC as a pathway to social cohesion, rather than a mechanism for punishment. While authorities recognize that the process touches on complex loyalties and past grievances, the emphasis remains on understanding the motivations behind historical events and promoting reconciliation for all communities involved.
The conversations surrounding truth and reconciliation have also sparked calls for broad, inclusive engagement that acknowledges diverse experiences of victimhood and aggression. Some advocates argue for addressing broader legacies, including colonial-era impacts, to build a more comprehensive national healing process. Public discussions and consultations continue to shape how the commission approaches reconciliation, ensuring that voices from all corners of society are heard.
What this means for Fiji
– A voluntary, confidential space for truth-telling is central to the commission’s approach.
– The emphasis is on healing, not punitive action, with protections against self-incrimination for what is shared, barring intentional false statements.
– Recognition extends to all affected individuals, including those who may have contributed to past harms, with an aim to move beyond labeling and toward collective understanding.
– The process prioritizes psychosocial support and community resilience, in tandem with broader efforts to foster trust and social cohesion.
– Ongoing public consultations and community outreach are expected to continue informing the design and implementation of the TRC’s activities.
Summary
The Fiji Truth and Reconciliation Commission remains focused on providing a safe, voluntary space for truth-telling that centers on healing and resilience. While not a substitute for formal justice, the process seeks to acknowledge the wounds of Fiji’s coups, protect participants, and encourage a shared path toward reconciliation and national unity.
Additional note
Leaders and faith groups have highlighted the importance of inclusive conversations that go beyond individual culpability to address wider societal harms and historical injustices. As Fiji progresses with its reconciliation efforts, broad participation from all communities will be crucial to turning past traumas into a foundation for a more peaceful and cohesive future.
Leave a comment