The tribunal responsible for reviewing the case of suspended Fiji Corrections Service Commissioner Dr. Jalesi Nakarawa has adjourned proceedings to address witness lists and procedural issues before a more extensive hearing planned for tomorrow. During today’s session, Dr. Nakarawa’s defense team expressed its intention to seek permission to cross-examine the Minister for Justice, arguing that political motivations may have played a role in the decision to forward the case to the Constitutional Offices Commission (COC).
The defense plans to file a formal application outlining the rationale for including the Minister as a witness, highlighting concerns about potential political interference regarding Dr. Nakarawa’s suspension. The tribunal, presided over by Justice Daniel Goundar alongside Justices Savenaca Banuve and Dane Tuiqereqere, clarified that no finding of misconduct has been made thus far, with the case still in the fact-finding stage.
Assisting counsel for the tribunal confirmed that they have identified 12 witnesses who will offer evidence relevant to the allegations against Dr. Nakarawa. The defense also requested approval for additional witnesses regarding the events leading up to his suspension, promising to submit further affidavits this week.
Dr. Nakarawa, who was appointed as Commissioner in May 2023, faced suspension in March this year after receiving complaints that included claims about nepotism, conflict of interest, and governance issues within the Fiji Corrections Service. The tribunal will reconvene tomorrow afternoon, continuing its inquiry into the allegations and ensuring that proper procedures are followed in this significant case.
This inquiry stands as a potentially pivotal moment for governance within the Fiji Corrections Service, offering an opportunity to address longstanding concerns about accountability and transparency in public office. With public and media attendance permitted during the proceedings, the case aligns with broader efforts to reinforce standards of integrity in Fijian public institutions. As the process progresses, there is optimism that it will foster meaningful reforms, enhancing both operational standards and restoring public trust in governance.
Leave a comment