The Fiji Office of the Attorney-General has responded to concerns raised by former MP Niko Nawaikula, who questioned provisions of the 2013 Constitution that he described as racially discriminatory. In a statement issued on Friday, the AG’s office reaffirmed its commitment to democratic principles and the rule of law, stressing that Fiji’s people must have a say in shaping their Constitution.
The statement noted that public concerns about the 2013 Constitution, including Nawaikula’s claims of racial bias, can be addressed through the constitutional review process and through appropriate channels. It urged the public to remain patient and to respect the judicial process, as the case is currently before Fiji’s highest court. The Coalition Government, the statement added, has shown its willingness to listen and respond to cultural and political concerns through lawful means.
This development comes amid a broader, ongoing conversation about constitutional reform in Fiji. Other voices in Parliament and among political leaders have repeatedly called for deeper citizen engagement and a review of the framework that governs amendments. Proposals circulating in the public discourse include increasing accessibility to the amendment process and ensuring that any changes reflect a diverse range of Fijian perspectives.
Analysts note that Fiji’s path to reform remains complex, given the constitutional provisions that govern amendments and the recent push to clarify which sections can be altered by Parliament or through referendums. Yet the focus on transparency, legal process, and public participation is a common thread across discussions, with supporters arguing that a more inclusive approach will strengthen national unity and the legitimacy of any revised constitution.
As Fiji navigates this era of constitutional dialogue, the government’s emphasis on lawful consultation and judicial oversight is being framed as essential to preserving stability while adapting the constitution to contemporary needs. Observers are watching closely to see how the courts and the review process balance historical considerations with the will of the people, and whether this will yield a more representative framework for governance.
Commentators also point to broader themes in the reform debate, including the desire to ensure that reforms do not merely serve political expediency but genuinely reflect the diverse voices of Fiji’s multiracial society. With ongoing discussions about changing the amendment thresholds and enhancing citizen engagement, there is cautious optimism that Fiji can achieve a constitutional framework that upholds the rule of law, protects rights, and fosters unity.
In short, the AG’s response signals a continued commitment to a transparent, participatory, and legally grounded approach to addressing concerns about the 2013 Constitution as Fiji pursues constitutional reform. This moment is being watched as a potential turning point toward a more inclusive governance model that invites broad public input while staying within established legal channels.
Summary: The Office of the Attorney-General has framed concerns about racism in the 2013 Constitution as part of an ongoing, lawful constitutional review process, encouraging patience and public engagement as Fiji moves toward reform. This stance aligns with broader calls for inclusive dialogue and transparent procedures in shaping Fiji’s constitutional future.
Leave a comment