Minister for Public Works and Transport Ro Filipe Tuisawau addressed Parliament, emphasizing the need for Fiji to reconsider its constitutional framework against the backdrop of its extensive history. He called for a departure from the heavy influence of the 2013 Constitution, illustrating how Fiji’s constitutional journey has transitioned through several significant milestones, from the original 1970 independence Constitution, to the versions adopted in 1992 and 1997, and to the turmoil following the events of 2000 and the dismissal of the SDL government in 2006, ultimately leading to the 2013 Constitution.
Tuisawau pointed out that the ongoing review by the coalition government, which includes the Referendum Bill, is aimed at mending an imposed constitutional structure. He criticized the previous administration for fostering an environment that centralized power within the state while simultaneously diminishing cultural liberties, particularly concerning indigenous traditions and institutions.
He articulated concerns regarding ideologies that manipulate the populace, recalling historical conflicts induced by dogmatic governance, likening the 2013 Constitution to an imposed ideology serving specific interests. A notable example he cited was the abolition of the Great Council of Chiefs, which he claimed was perceived as a threat to state authority.
Reaffirming the importance of mutual respect among cultures, Tuisawau noted that indigenous bodies like the GCC and provincial councils have never sought to overpower the state. He also challenged criticisms from the former government over the absence of ethnic data in the national Household Income and Expenditure Survey, arguing that such omissions compromise statistical integrity.
Tuisawau rejected assertions that recognizing indigenous identities or traditional governance methods constitutes separatism, affirming that established processes already facilitate prior consent in land leasing and development. He highlighted that cultural expressions such as meke and various council gatherings have long been integral to community engagement. In addressing concerns regarding the safety of indigenous Fijians, he insisted that the true threat lies against their traditional institutions.
This discourse underscores a pivotal moment in Fiji’s constitutional history, showcasing a commitment to honor and preserve cultural identities while navigating the complexities of governance. With ongoing efforts to reassess the constitutional framework, there is hope for a more inclusive future that respects the rich tapestry of Fiji’s diverse heritage.
Leave a comment