The Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Tourism and Civil Aviation, Viliame Gavoka, has expressed disappointment regarding recent corruption allegations against the Fiji Rugby Union (FRU) made by overseas-based players. In a conversation with SUNsports, Gavoka, who previously chaired the FRU, highlighted the challenges faced by the board of directors and staff at Rugby House.
His comments followed a media interview with former Flying Fijians captain Waisea Nayacalevu, who discussed the players’ plans to boycott last year’s Rugby World Cup quarter-final against England due to unpaid bonuses and alleged corruption within the FRU. Senior players including Semi Radradra, Levani Botia, Meli Derenalagi, Jiuta Wainiqolo, and Albert Tuisue have echoed Nayacalevu’s concerns and called for the removal of the interim trustees and staff members at the FRU.
Gavoka stated, “Everyone involved in rugby is a very honorable person.” He noted that rugby administration often relies on volunteer efforts, and he himself did not receive compensation during his tenure as chairman. He expressed sorrow over the players blaming the administration and board for their struggles.
He emphasized the high costs associated with rugby in Fiji, a sport predominantly played by the iTaukei community, and acknowledged the lack of resources. Despite these challenges, Gavoka affirmed the desire to compete against teams like England and France. He pointed out that financial issues are a constant struggle for the FRU, noting the dedication and sacrifices made by those involved in the sport’s governance.
“People running the show today are all honorable people who have contributed significantly to rugby,” Gavoka mentioned. He explained that if Fiji wants to compete internationally, it requires substantial funds, and sponsorship options are limited in a small market like Fiji.
Gavoka highlighted the importance of support from sponsors like Fiji Water and Fiji Airways but stressed that financial constraints remain a significant reality for rugby in Fiji. He pointed out that employees often came to work uncertain about their pay, reflecting the precarious financial situation within the organization.