Dialogue Fiji has expressed strong opposition to the proposed Referendum Bill 2025, calling it one of the most repressive and undemocratic pieces of legislation ever introduced in the nation. Executive Director Nilesh Lal voiced concerns that the Bill essentially criminalizes any form of speech or expression regarding referendum issues.
Lal explained that under the proposed legislation, civic education initiatives, public awareness campaigns, academic discussions, and civil society advocacy would be deemed illegal. This extends to individuals attempting to persuade others on how to vote. The restrictions imposed by the Bill would prevent the display of any referendum-related badges, symbols, posters, or advertising at any time surrounding the referendum period.
These provisions are seen as an outright suppression of public discourse on significant national matters, particularly those concerning the country’s constitution. Lal remarked, “This is about as undemocratic as it gets. It is far worse than anything imposed by FijiFirst,” emphasizing that such restrictions undermine the very essence of public participation at crucial moments when debate is most needed.
The proposed Bill’s limitations are particularly contradictory to the government’s past denunciations of stringent laws and its professed commitment to democratic values. Dialogue Fiji noted that no liberal democracy imposes such extreme measures, contrasting Fiji’s approach with practices in nations like Australia, where referendum campaigns are robustly open and citizen-led, and Vanuatu, which fostered open public discussions during its recent referendum.
“Our neighbors demonstrate that peaceful, orderly referendums can occur without silencing the public,” Lal stated. He criticized Fiji’s legal approach as leaning toward authoritarian control rather than embracing democratic practices.
Additionally, the Bill places central oversight of referendum communication in the hands of the Supervisor of Elections, limiting the flow of information to citizens. “A referendum can only be legitimate if citizens are free to hear arguments and discuss issues,” Lal argued, pointing out that the Bill criminalizes the dialogue necessary for a meaningful referendum.
In light of these concerns, Dialogue Fiji is urging the Government and Parliament to reconsider the legislation, advocating for a comprehensive redraft that incorporates genuine public consultation. This call reflects a commitment not only to democratic principles but also to ensuring that citizen voices remain integral to Fiji’s political processes.
Leave a comment