A senior police officer has expressed deep concerns regarding the militarization of the Fiji Police Force, stating that officers “can no longer tell what the colour blue looks like.” This comment was made during discussions with the National Security and Defence Review (NSDR) team, following the release of a 94-page report that highlights issues within Fiji’s security forces.
The report brings attention to the negative effects of the Republic of Fiji Military Forces on the Fiji Police and Corrections services. It notes a significant decline in community trust in the Fiji Police Force, which has been linked to human rights violations following past coups, allegations of police involvement in the drug trade, corruption, and instances of police brutality.
Senior police officials reported that the introduction of military officers into high-ranking police positions has altered the police culture. One officer mentioned the shift in their fundamental identity, emphasizing that the military influence has fostered a “warrior culture” that favors coercive tactics in interactions with the public. This change is believed to compromise the independence of police investigations, as junior officers feel compelled to follow directives without question.
The application of strict military discipline has reportedly heightened the risk of human rights violations, exacerbating public fear and distrust towards law enforcement. Stakeholders have voiced concerns that militarization has harmed the service-oriented culture of the Fiji Police Force. Similar trends are observed in the Fiji Corrections Service, which has adopted military-style uniforms and publicly parades with weapons.
Despite these issues, some police representatives argue that the perception of widespread public distrust is exaggerated and that a few “bad apples” have tarnished the force’s reputation. They assert that various crime categories need a comprehensive governmental approach, and the police are often unfairly blamed for issues beyond their control.
The report suggests renaming “police force” to “police service” but acknowledges that such a change in terminology would not inherently produce the desired transformation. It calls for a cultural shift within the police organization, emphasizing the need for a transformative leader who can transition the ethos from a warrior mentality to one that fosters guardianship and community protection.