Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka has voiced disappointment with recent public comments by Justice David Ashton-Lewis, calling them regrettable and potentially damaging to public trust as Fiji’s Commission of Inquiry into the appointment of Barbara Malimali continues.
Ashton-Lewis, who led the inquiry, had personal remarks about the Commission’s recommendations, including suggestions about action against sitting judicial officials. Rabuka responded that the former Commissioner should refrain from further commentary now that his mandate has ended, stressing that the Commission’s role was inquisitorial, not prosecutorial, and that its mandate concluded with the submission of its report to the President.
Rabuka underscored that any further steps will be determined by proper constitutional authorities. He affirmed that the responsibility for acting on the Commission’s recommendations lies with His Excellency the President and that the report has been referred to the relevant law enforcement agencies for due process. He also urged Justice Ashton-Lewis to uphold the dignity of his office and to respect the procedural process to avoid undermining public confidence. Rabuka reassured Fijians that any decisions will be made strictly in accordance with the law, guided by natural justice, and with full regard for the integrity of national institutions.
Context around the inquiry’s findings has been amplified by related reporting. Similar articles show the COI’s 648-page report, which includes testimonies from 33 of 40 witnesses and 72 recommendations, and indicates that nine senior officials were implicated in misconduct such as lying under oath or obstructing justice in relation to Malimali’s appointment as FICAC Commissioner. The inquiry’s scope has involved testimonies from witnesses both in person and virtually, including appearances from abroad, and it has prompted ongoing discussions about accountability and governance reforms in Fiji.
The discourse surrounding the proceedings has also drawn scrutiny from the legal community. The Fiji Law Society raised concerns about the conduct and handling of confidential information by Justice Ashton-Lewis, arguing that questions of confidentiality and independence are paramount in leading inquiries of this nature. While some observers emphasize the need for transparency and accountability, others caution that commentary from the commissioner should not erode public confidence or political stability.
For now, the inquiry progresses with the President and law enforcement agencies poised to determine subsequent steps, and with Rabuka reiterating a commitment to due process. The overarching aim remains to strengthen accountability and transparency in Fiji’s governance, restore public trust, and guide reforms that uphold integrity in public service.
In summary, Rabuka’s remarks frame a call for measured, legally grounded action after the Commission’s work, while the broader debate about the findings and their implications reflects ongoing efforts to bolster governance and public trust in Fiji. Observers remain hopeful that the process will yield meaningful reforms and reinforce confidence in the country’s institutions.
Leave a comment