Opposition MP Premila Kumar has criticized the Government for what she perceives as impulsive decision-making rather than principled governance. This statement comes in light of the recent incident involving the Fiji National University (FNU), which was initially transferred to the Office of the Prime Minister before being returned to the Ministry of Education.
Kumar asserts that this situation reveals a troubling level of indecision at the upper echelons of leadership and raises critical concerns regarding governance under Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka. She emphasized that this event is more than a simple administrative shift; it underscores a lack of stability in government operations.
“Government by impulse raises serious questions about the type of leadership we have,” Kumar stated. She expressed skepticism regarding the verbal directive that led to FNU’s relocation to the Prime Minister’s office, followed by what she terms a hasty reversal of that decision. Kumar believes such actions contribute to a diminished public faith in the government’s leadership.
“Should the Prime Minister waver in his decisions, it sets a precedent that undermines the call for discipline among his Cabinet members and accountability from public servants,” she argued, stressing that FNU should not be utilized as a political pawn subject to the whims of current leadership.
Kumar further articulated that the Office of the Prime Minister demands clarity, authority, and decisive direction. She warned that frequent reversals of decisions indicate weak leadership, stating, “What the public is witnessing is hesitation, reversal, and an absence of firm leadership.”
This incident highlights the importance of decisive and consistent governance in ensuring trust and confidence from the public. The critique from Kumar serves as a reminder of the need for strong, principled leadership to navigate the complexities of governance effectively.
Leave a comment