Fiji Opposition Slams Govt for Blocking Parliament Debate on Higher Education Funding Report

The Parliamentary Opposition in Fiji has strongly criticized the government’s decision to retract a motion for debate on the Consolidated Review Report covering the Fiji Higher Education Commission’s Annual Reports from 2018 to 2021. This withdrawal has been labeled by the Opposition as an instance of “concealment” and a “blow to transparency,” raising concerns over accountability regarding allocations made to certain educational institutions.

In a statement, the Opposition expressed its “deep concern” regarding this sudden move, which it claims undermines Parliament’s ability to tackle significant accountability issues highlighted in the reports. The Opposition pointed out that a key recommendation within the report calls for a Commission of Inquiry to scrutinize the funding distribution to organizations like Pacific Polytech and Service Pro Institute.

Citing bipartisan approval from the Social Affairs Committee for the report, the Opposition suggests that pressure may have been exerted on the Chair of the Standing Committee on Social Affairs to withdraw it. They assert that this politically motivated withdrawal is designed to protect individuals who may face scrutiny if an inquiry is initiated.

“This act of withdrawing the motion to debate the report is indeed a betrayal of public trust,” the Opposition’s statement declared, emphasizing that the citizens of Fiji have a right to know the full details surrounding the allocation of public funds, especially considering that these are taxpayer dollars.

The current political climate in Fiji is characterized by persistent calls for greater transparency and accountability in governance. This situation underscores the ongoing contention between the government and the Opposition, reflecting a broader demand from the public for responsible management of public funds.

Amid this controversy, there remains hope that the ongoing debate surrounding financial oversight and public accountability will prompt improvements in governance practices. As the situation unfolds, it reinforces the need for transparent dialogue and actions that truly serve the interests of the public.