The Fiji National University (FNU) Council has initiated a call for an independent investigation addressing governance and management challenges, including complaints against the vice-chancellor, as articulated by council chairman Semesa Karavaki. This call comes in response to concerns raised by whistleblowers, including academic staff member Dr. Odille Chang, about decision-making processes at the university.
Mr. Karavaki noted that the council has concentrated on contentious issues related to appointments within the College of Medicine, Nursing and Health Science, as well as the awarding of various academic titles. He indicated that due to the serious nature of the allegations, the vice-chancellor has been placed on leave while the investigation proceeds.
The council resolved that advertisements for senior positions and contract renewals will require their approval, with an external review process being developed to conduct a comprehensive HR audit aimed at identifying existing gaps. Additionally, there is concern regarding the vice-chancellor’s independent discussions with government officials about a legislative review for FNU, which occurred without the council’s oversight.
Highlighting the problematic situation at FNU, Mr. Karavaki stated that there are several “red flags” resembling issues faced by universities globally where the integrity of academic appointments has been compromised. These concerns include executive overreach, bypassing statutory governance, and whistleblower grievances, compounded by sudden high-level political changes amid ongoing disciplinary measures.
In a related matter, Mr. Karavaki has requested an urgent meeting with Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka regarding the university’s controversial reassignment to the Prime Minister’s Office. He emphasized that the discussions surrounding this matter were not formally introduced to the council, leaving members inadequately informed.
While the council does not oppose the reassignment itself, Mr. Karavaki pointed out that the process has created divisions and raised questions about the conduct of management in relation to council governance. He asserted that the vice-chancellor and her senior team acted independently, circumventing the council on decisions of significant impact.
Despite these tensions, Mr. Karavaki reiterated the council’s commitment to good governance, transparency, and accountability in efforts to restore public confidence in the university. He expressed disappointment over the public backlash stemming from the reassignment, which has adversely affected both the university’s and the council’s reputations. The council is determined to advocate for fairness and due process as it navigates this turbulent period.
Leave a comment