The Fiji Law Society has expressed its concerns regarding the proceedings of the tribunal investigating the suspended Director of Public Prosecutions, Christopher Pryde. In a letter to the tribunal’s chair, FLS President Wylie Clark highlighted a crucial issue: the tribunal’s ability to continue its proceedings without the presence of Pryde or his legal representation.
Clark pointed out that Pryde had initially been backed by legal counsel, but the counsel withdrew due to financial constraints after his salary was suspended. This situation raises significant questions about Pryde’s right to procedural fairness as outlined in Section 16(1)(a) of the Constitution.
The Fiji Law Society is willing to assist the tribunal as “amicus curiae,” which means they aim to provide impartial advice and insights without taking a direct role in the case. Their support would include offering expert legal opinions, presenting key legal arguments for the tribunal’s consideration, and clarifying the broader legal implications tied to the case.
Clark mentioned that the tribunal has requested guidance on the interpretation of “misbehaviour” within similar constitutional contexts. The Society is ready to submit commentary focused on these matters to aid the tribunal in their deliberations.
This proactive stance by the Fiji Law Society demonstrates a commitment to ensuring fair legal proceedings while navigating the complexities of the situation. By stepping in as a friend of the court, they aim to enhance the legal process and uphold the principles of justice, thereby fostering a hope for a transparent and fair resolution in the investigation of Christopher Pryde.
Leave a comment