The Fiji Law Society has advised Janet Mason, who is assisting the Commission of Inquiry (COI) regarding the appointment of Barbara Malimali as Commissioner of the Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC), to step aside from her role. The Society believes her continued participation could undermine public confidence in the integrity of the inquiry but clarified that they are not advocating for her outright removal. They recommend Mason step aside until her ongoing professional conduct issues are resolved.

This recommendation arises from a misconduct finding against Mason by the New Zealand Lawyers and Conveyancers Disciplinary Tribunal, a decision she is currently appealing. Additionally, serious allegations regarding her application for a practicing certificate in Fiji have been raised, prompting concerns about the handling of her case by the Legal Practitioners Unit.

The Fiji Law Society emphasizes that maintaining high standards of integrity and professionalism among all participants in the inquiry is essential. Given the inquiry scrutinizes the legality and propriety of Malimali’s appointment, it is crucial for both Mason and the Commissioner to be regarded as having integrity beyond reproach to preserve public trust in the COI’s processes.

Mason has vocally rejected these implications, accusing the Fiji Law Society of attempting to sabotage her role. She has filed a police report regarding allegations of document tampering related to her practicing certificate application, insisting on her qualifications and integrity as a legal practitioner.

The ongoing inquiry is a pivotal moment for governance and accountability in Fiji. It seeks not only to clarify the specific allegations surrounding Malimali’s appointment but also aims to promote a culture of ethical practices within the broader political and legal framework. There is hope that the inquiry could generate essential reforms that enhance public trust in governmental operations and foster a renewed commitment to integrity within Fiji’s institutions.

In summary, while challenges persist regarding Mason’s role in the inquiry, this situation also highlights an opportunity for significant change and improvement in Fiji’s governance landscape. The expectation is that the findings of the inquiry can catalyze necessary reforms, ultimately reinforcing accountability and transparency in the nation’s political and legal systems.