The judicial review involving Barbara Malimali, the former Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC) Commissioner, is set for hearing on July 27. Malimali appeared in the Suva High Court with her lawyer to discuss the latest submissions from both sides. In this case, the State has been ordered to pay $1,500 by the end of this week, a cost related to the initial judicial review leave application.
Malimali is contesting her dismissal which followed her suspension and subsequent termination by the President of Fiji based on advice from Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka. This legal challenge names Prime Minister Rabuka, President Ratu Naiqama Lalabalavu, and the Attorney General’s Office as respondents.
The judicial review aims to examine the legality of her dismissal, focusing on whether the constitutional framework allowed for the Prime Minister to advise the President on such matters, a role traditionally held by the Judicial Services Commission (JSC). Justice Dane Tuiqereqere, who presides over the case, previously granted leave for the review, recognizing that significant issues regarding procedural fairness and governance are at stake.
This legal battle has stoked public interest, drawing attention to governance and accountability in Fiji, particularly concerning the operation of the anti-corruption commission. The broader dialogue suggests potential reforms that may arise from this high-profile case, which could enhance the integrity and transparency of Fiji’s governance systems.
Observers hope that the judicial review will provoke meaningful discussions about government oversight and result in reforms that reinforce public confidence. The case represents a significant moment in Fiji’s political and judicial landscape, potentially shaping future practices and fostering greater transparency and integrity in public office.
Leave a comment