Justice Aruna Aluthge delivered a sharp rebuke and a heavy sentence yesterday, handing David Heritage 55 years in prison with a 25-year non-parole period after finding him to have played a leading role in Fiji’s largest methamphetamine operation.
The judge rejected Defence Team arguments that Heritage’s role was lesser, stating, “You played a leading role in the drug operation, albeit not to the extent Justin Ho played,” and noting that Heritage planned with Sam Amine and Justin Ho, received $30,000 in advance, and believed he could reap about US$2 million upon completion of the importation. He was praised for coordinating the shipment “from start to finish,” including arranging for a barge to move the drugs into Fiji and ensuring the operation ran with a high level of sophistication.
Aggravating factors highlighted by the court included the operation’s sophistication, which used superyachts, satellite phones, and encrypted apps to coordinate movement. Heritage also exposed his brother-in-law to risk by sending him to sea to bring in the drugs, and he allegedly paid the barge skipper generously while implying police and military connections could deter reporting to authorities. The judge questioned Heritage’s legitimacy as a businessman and said tainted money was used to buy equipment, including a generator. Heritage spent seven months in remand before the sentencing.
The court detailed Heritage’s sentencing framework: a starting point of 45 years, an additional 13 years for aggravating factors, and a deduction of three years for mitigating factors, resulting in the final 55-year term.
Heritage’s case sits within Fiji’s largest drug-trafficking investigation, which involved more than four tonnes of methamphetamine and drew international attention. The operation reportedly unfolded across Denarau, Legalega, and other sites in the Nadi region before inland distribution, and it has led to a broader judicial push against transnational crime in the Pacific.
In related developments within the same case, other defendants received substantial penalties. Justin Ho, described by the court as the mastermind behind the operation, was given a life sentence with a 30-year non-parole period. Co-defendants received lengthy terms as well: Aukerea was handed 50 years with a 25-year non-parole period; Logaivau and Tuva each got 25 years with 18-year non-parole periods; Levula received 17 years with a 13-year non-parole period; Tuirabe and Colowaliku each received 15 years with a 12-year non-parole period; and Davelevu was sentenced to 14 years with a 12-year non-parole period. The sentencing underscores Fiji’s firm stance against large-scale, transnational drug trafficking and signals a deterrent effect aimed at disrupting sophisticated drug networks.
Witness testimony throughout the trial has described threats and coercion linked to the operation, including claims of intimidation by individuals described as connected to a “Russian Mafia.” Heritage himself has spoken of threats to himself and his family, and the court has heard that Ho influenced others through coercion. Prosecutors argued that the driving motive was money, citing Heritage’s stated potential gain and his role in coordinating the logistics chain from barge movements to inland storage.
What this means going forward is that Fiji continues to pursue a hard-line approach against cross-border drug trafficking, emphasizing public safety and the disruption of criminal networks. As remaining trials and sentencing proceedings unfold for other co-defendants, readers can expect continued coverage of how Fiji is strengthening cross-jorder cooperation, asset seizure, and judicial accountability in high-stakes cases.
Additional value for readers
– A quick explainer on Fiji’s non-parole periods and how they interact with actual release decisions could help readers understand the long-term implications of these sentences.
– Brief bios or sidebars summarizing each defendant’s role, charges, and penalties would provide clearer context for following the case.
– A regional angle on how Pacific nations are coordinating to combat transnational crime could offer readers insight into law enforcement and judicial cooperation.
Summary: The Lautoka High Court’s ruling sends a clear message that Fiji will impose heavy penalties on those who mastermind and profit from large-scale drug trafficking, reinforcing public safety and determent of future transnational crime. The case showcases the scale of the operation, overseas links, and the judiciary’s commitment to dismantling sophisticated drug networks in the Pacific.
Leave a comment