Barbara Malimali, the Commissioner of the Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC), is facing intensified scrutiny from the Commission of Inquiry (COI) regarding her appointment. During the inquiry, counsel Janet Mason disclosed that Malimali had sent an email questioning the access granted to former FICAC investigations manager Kuliniasi Saumi concerning documents vital to the inquiry.
This situation arises as Saumi prepares to testify before the COI about important FICAC files. Notably, he had previously encountered difficulties accessing these documents after his dismissal by Malimali. However, he successfully retrieved the necessary files with assistance from Acting Deputy Commissioner Lisiate Fotofili, who provided assurances regarding document accessibility and witness protection during the inquiry process.
Mason raised concerns about Malimali’s subsequent objections to Saumi’s access, suggesting that her actions could undermine the inquiry’s integrity. The COI has been in discussions with Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka and President Ratu Naiqama Lalabalavu about the implications of these events, contemplating various legal options to address the unfolding situation.
The backdrop of this inquiry is filled with serious allegations against Malimali regarding her conduct at FICAC. The commission is particularly focused on her management of witness testimonies and potential threats to their safety, exacerbated by decisions such as Saumi’s termination. The COI perceives Malimali’s appointment as potentially compromising the inquiry’s credibility, advocating instead for a temporary suspension rather than simply placing her on leave.
This inquiry represents a crucial opportunity to address governance issues in Fiji, reinforcing public trust in institutions intended to combat corruption. It also advocates for necessary reforms that could boost protections for whistleblowers and uphold ethical standards in public office. The ongoing inquiry seeks to promote justice and transparency within government structures, paving the way for improved accountability in Fiji’s governance.
As these developments continue to unfold, the commitment of the involved authorities to uphold the integrity of public institutions establishes a hopeful precedent for addressing misconduct allegations within the nation’s leadership, potentially fostering a culture of accountability and ethical governance moving forward.
Leave a comment