Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka has expressed his support for the Tribunal’s recent ruling that has cleared Christopher Pryde of allegations of misconduct, following his reinstatement as the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP). In a press conference, Rabuka praised President Ratu Naiqama Lalabalavu for the decision to restore Pryde to his former position while reinstating his lost salary and benefits.

Rabuka emphasized the significance of due process throughout the inquiry performed by the Tribunal, expressing gratitude towards its Chairman and members for their diligent investigation and comprehensive report. A critical aspect of the Tribunal’s findings was its examination of the undefined term “misbehaviour” in the Fijian Constitution. This precedent not only absolves Pryde but will also assist the Judicial Services Commission and other judicial bodies in managing future cases involving judicial and quasi-judicial officials.

The Prime Minister expressed confidence in Pryde’s ability to fulfill his duties impartially and without bias, underlining the DPP’s role as an independent officer bound to respect the law and the Constitution. This reinstatement is seen as a key step toward restoring stability and integrity within Fiji’s prosecutorial branch.

The Tribunal’s decision is not merely a personal victory for Pryde but also serves to reinforce the governance and accountability of Fiji’s judiciary, fostering public trust in the institutions that maintain justice. By clarifying the implications associated with the term “misbehaviour,” the findings encourage transparency in evaluating complaints against judicial figures.

Overall, this development paints a hopeful picture for the future of Fiji’s judicial system, highlighting a commitment to fairness, transparency, and due process that is essential for upholding public confidence in the nation’s governance and legal frameworks. The Tribunal’s efforts signal an ongoing dedication to improving the legal landscape in Fiji, paving the way for continued reform and accountability within the judiciary.