Suspended Director of Public Prosecutions Christopher Pryde has formally notified Chairman of the Constitutional Tribunal, Justice Anare Tuilevuka, about his inability to attend the tribunal’s hearing scheduled for next week. In his correspondence, Pryde emphasized concerns regarding the fairness and integrity of the proceedings, stating that he has been deprived of the necessary means to defend himself adequately.
Pryde argued that holding the hearing under these circumstances undermines the President’s directive for the Tribunal to conduct proceedings justly and fairly. He asserted that the situation also contravenes relevant International Labour Organisation conventions to which Fiji is a signatory.
Pryde pointed fingers at the acting Chief Justice and the Judicial Services Commission (JSC) for their role in his suspension, claiming that their actions reflect a disregard for the fairness of the Tribunal’s processes. He believes the matter should be referred back to the acting Chief Justice and the President, labeling their decisions as interference in the tribunal’s proceedings.
Despite the challenges posed by his suspension, Pryde remains resolute. He highlighted public support from the Prime Minister for the reinstatement of his salary and expressed his determination not to be coerced into resigning or participating in a hearing without adequate defense capacity. Pryde underlined the fundamental right to defend himself, calling the denial of this right a breach of natural justice.
He strongly requested that the Tribunal seek an extension from the President until the matter of his salary and entitlements is resolved. Once reinstated, Pryde indicated his readiness to engage his legal counsel and proceed with the tribunal matters.
This situation underscores the ongoing tension surrounding judicial procedures and the importance of fair representation in legal matters. The legal landscape in Fiji may be at a critical juncture, as this case may prompt discussions on reforming the processes to ensure justice for all parties involved.
In summary, Christopher Pryde’s refusal to participate in the tribunal due to a lack of support and resources highlights significant concerns about the legal system’s integrity in Fiji. His determination to uphold his rights may inspire a renewed focus on fair legal practices in the country.
Leave a comment