Christopher Pryde, the suspended Director of Public Prosecutions in Fiji, has strongly refuted allegations made by Acting Chief Justice Salesi Temo, claiming that they constitute a “defamatory slur” on his character. In a recent statement to FijiLive, Pryde emphasized the necessity of addressing these accusations head-on.
He challenged the Acting Chief Justice on several points, including his decision not to report the alleged theft of taxpayer funds to the appropriate authorities. Pryde criticized Temo for his “outrageous, defamatory, and untrue statements” made in the Tribunal and suggested that Temo’s actions amount to contempt by advising the President to suspend his salary unlawfully.
In October, Pryde revealed that Chief Registrar Tomasi Bainivalu had sent a communication to his legal team regarding a settlement offer. Despite the offer, Pryde declined it, insisting on a letter from the President clearing his name. This request was not accommodated, leading to the withdrawal of the settlement offer.
Pryde also expressed concern that the Tribunal proceeded with hearings in his absence, a move supported by the Fiji Law Society. He contends that this situation creates an unfair environment where allegations remain unchallenged, thereby potentially misleading the Tribunal. He described the marginalization he has faced as leading to “substantial unfairness and grave injustice.”
In correspondence from the Judicial Services Commission (JSC), Pryde was offered a $200,000 settlement if he would resign immediately as DPP. The JSC indicated that accepting this proposal would conclude proceedings and prevent Pryde from pursuing any legal actions against them in the future.
In summary, the escalating conflict between Pryde and the judiciary reflects deeper issues surrounding due process and accountability within the legal system in Fiji. As the situation develops, it urges a critical examination of the structures in place to ensure justice prevails for all involved.
Given the gravity of these revelations, it is crucial that both parties continue to engage constructively to resolve these matters and restore public trust in the judicial system. There is hope that through dialogue and adherence to legal principles, a fair resolution can be reached that upholds the rights of all involved and fortifies Fiji’s commitment to justice.
Leave a comment