The hearing regarding three motions filed by former Supervisor of Elections, Mohammed Saneem, began today in front of Suva Magistrate Yogesh Prasad. The motions concern the legitimacy of the charges brought forth by then-acting Director of Public Prosecutions John Rabuku, allegations of violation of fundamental human rights, and the specifics of the Electoral Act empowering FICAC to investigate and prosecute Saneem.
Saneem is accused of unlawfully accepting a corrupt benefit amounting to $55,944.03 as back pay from the former attorney-general, Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum. He is represented by well-known Suva attorney Devanesh Sharma, while the state is represented by Acting Director of Public Prosecutions Nancy Tikoisuva.
The prosecution’s request to consolidate charges against Sayed-Khaiyum has been postponed until the courts address Saneem’s motions. The former attorney-general is currently facing a separate charge of abuse of office. Magistrate Prasad has indicated that a ruling on these matters will be forthcoming next month.
This development highlights the complexities involved in the legal proceedings surrounding public officials and raises important discussions about accountability and judicial processes in Fiji. As the court prepares to make its ruling, this case may set precedents for governance and electoral integrity moving forward.
Summary: The hearing for former Supervisor of Elections Mohammed Saneem’s motions regarding his charges began today, with key legal figures involved. A decision is expected next month, underscoring issues of public accountability and legal scrutiny in Fiji.
Leave a comment